September 2025

Efficacy of risankizumab across GRAPPA domains in psoriatic arthritis: A pooled analysis of patients from the Phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 studies

RMD Open 2025;11:e005522 Doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005522

Treatment with risankizumab provides durable improvement in the signs and symptoms of PsA across all the GRAPPA disease domains and related conditions. This post hoc analysis by Coates et al. aimed to assess the efficacy of long-term treatment with risankizumab across the updated GRAPPA domains and key related conditions of PsA.

Keywords:

August 2025

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab subcutaneous induction and maintenance in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: Results from the Phase 3 GRAVITI study

Gastroenterology 2025;169:308–25 Doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.033

Results from the Phase 3 GRAVTI study by Hart et al. showed that SC induction followed by SC maintenance treatment with guselkumab resulted in superior clinical and endoscopic improvements in participants with moderately to severely active CD through 48 weeks compared with placebo. Hart et al. evaluated efficacy and safety of guselkumab SC induction followed by SC maintenance in participants with moderately to severely active CD in a    treat-through design.

Keywords:

Efficacy, safety, and drug survival during the first year of biologic therapy for psoriasis in elderly versus younger patients

International Journal of Dermatology 2025;64:1401–1408 Doi: 10.1111/ijd.17814

This study by Sobotkova et al. confirmed the similar efficacy and overall safety of biological treatment for psoriasis in older and younger adult patients. Authors compared a large cohort of older adults during the first year of biological treatment for psoriasis to younger adult patients with similar characteristics to advance knowledge about the biologic treatment of psoriasis in older patients.

Keywords:

A real-world comparison of clinical effectiveness of upadacitinib, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or interleukin-17 inhibitors in patients with axial spondyloarthritis after switching from an initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment

Rheumatol Ther 2025; Epub ahead of print doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00786-2

Baraliakos et al. compared real-world effectiveness of upadacitinib, TNF inhibitors, or IL-17 inhibitors following inadequate response to an initial TNF inhibitor in patients with axSpA. Upadacitinib was associated with greater reductions in pain and fewer affected joints compared with switching to a second TNF inhibitor or IL-17 inhibitor.

Keywords:

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Front Immunol 2025;16:1586792 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1586792

UPA has shown effectiveness in treating IMIDs like RA, axSpA, PsA, CD, and UC. Chai et al. evaluated evidence from a synthesis of RCTs and provided insights that may guide clinical decision-making and improve treatment outcomes for IMIDs. UPA effectively alleviated symptoms, reduced disease activity, and showed notable benefits in improving quality of life.

Keywords:

July 2025

Roflumilast foam, 0.3%, for psoriasis of the scalp and body the ARRECTOR Phase 3 randomized clinical trial

JAMA Dermatol 2025;7:698–706 doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1136

Gooderham et al. observed that roflumilast foam, 0.3%, improved signs and symptoms of PsO on the scalp and body, including pruritus, with low rates of AEs in patients ≥12 years of age. Authors assessed efficacy and safety of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, versus vehicle administered QD for 8 weeks in patients with PsO of the scalp and body.

Keywords:

A randomized Phase II study of efmarodocokin alfa, an interleukin-22 agonist, versus vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025;23:1387–1397 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.013

Danese et al. observed that efmarodocokin alfa did not demonstrate efficacy compared to the PBO, and this Phase II study ended early for futility; however, there was evidence of target engagement (skin AEs, regenerating islet derived protein 3-alpha).

Keywords:

Benefit–risk analysis of upadacitinib versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and higher or lower risk of cardiovascular disease

RMD Open 2025;11:e005371 doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005371

Burmester et al. provide insights into the benefit–risk profiles of UPA and adalimumab in patients with varying cardiovascular (CV) risks, suggesting that UPA may offer efficacy advantages over adalimumab irrespective of baseline CV risk, with generally similar rates of AEs. To better understand the benefits and risks of RA treatments in patients with different background CV risk, Burmester et al. assessed the short-term and long-term benefit–risk profiles of UPA and adalimumab in patients enrolled in SELECT-COMPARE.

Keywords:

June 2025

Obefazimod in patients with moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis: efficacy and safety analysis from the 96-week open-label maintenance phase 2b study

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 2025;19:jjaf074 doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf074

Vermeire et al. provides data that supports the long-term efficacy and safety of obefazimod 50mg QD, with a substantial proportion of patients achieving clinical remission at Weeks 48 and 96. Vermeire et al. evaluated the 2-year outcome data of an OLM study, which assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of obefazimod 50mg QD.

Keywords:

Long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis of the phase 3 U-ACTIVATE long-term extension study

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025;10:507–19 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00017-2

This interim analysis by Panaccione et al. supports the positive long–term risk–benefit profile for UPA 15mg and 30mg among patients with moderately to severely active UC. U–ACTIVATE is a Phase 3 LTE study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of UPA in patients with moderately to severely active UC who enrolled in the preceding induction and maintenance studies. Panaccione et al. reported the interim results from the U-ACTIVATE study after approximately 3 years of total treatment, showing that the risk–benefit profile of UPA in patients with moderately to severely active UC is favourable.

Keywords: