Publications

In this real-world study, Baraliakos, et al. SC IFX demonstrated clinical effectiveness in both
r- and nr-axSpA, with consistent results across diverse patient characteristics. Both physicians and patients reported high satisfaction with no new safety concerns. Authors assessed the real-world outcomes of CT-P13 SC (SC IFX) as treatment for both r- and
nr-axSpA.

Bakay et al. report  that upadacitinib (UPA) demonstrated sustained efficacy across musculoskeletal and skin domains in PsA patients with prior inadequate response to TNF inhibitors, with a safety profile consistent with previous reports.  Authors conducted a retrospective, single-centre observational study evaluating musculoskeletal disease activity, psoriasis, and patient-reported outcomes following initiation of UPA.

Gollins et al. reported that within this cohort, the Psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC) response to 4^th+ lines of b/tsDMARD was not significantly reduced compared with 2^nd/3^rd line in participants who had failed at least 3 b/tsDMARDs. Authors evaluated the primary clinical response to sequential lines of b/tsDMARD therapy in PsA, focusing on the effectiveness of later line treatments.

Bai et al. reported that JAKi therapy was associated with a reduced risk of incident uveitis compared with TNF inhibitors among patients with AS, PsO, or PsA. Authors conducted a large-scale, real world comparative study which evaluated the risk of incident uveitis among patients with psoriatic disease and AS treated with either TNFi or JAKi.

Nozaki et al. showed that JAK inhibitor treatment provided sustained disease control (especially in high-risk RA patients) and promoted GC reduction, although TNF inhibitors remain a standard option. Nozaki et al. evaluated the clinical efficacy and continuation rates of JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors in RA patients with poor-prognosis factors (PPFs).

Hernández-Hernández et al. showed that in a real-world clinical settings, UPA persistence is lower among RA patients who have received prior IL-6i treatment; and that treatment strategies to avoid UPA in patients with cardiovascular risk (CVR) appear to be primarily driven by pivotal safety studies rather than regulatory guidance.

Lindner et al. report that their findings underscore the need for sex-specific treatment strategies and more comprehensive research into biological and sociocultural factors influencing therapy persistence and reasons for discontinuation in real-world settings. Authors investigated sex differences in treatment outcomes, persistence, discontinuation reasons, and adverse events during first-line b/tsDMARD therapy.

This study by Lee et al. is the first to evaluate the association between adalimumab dosing intervals and uveitis recurrence in patients with AS. Authors investigated whether extending the dosing interval of adalimumab influences the recurrence of uveitis in AS patients with a history of AU who are on adalimumab therapy.

This large French nationwide study by Fautrel et al. provided reassuring results for patients, who initiated tocilizumab (TCZ), aged at least 75 years compared to younger patients. Authors compared patient characteristics, tolerance of RA treatments, and long-term management with TCZ in patients with RA over and under 75 years of age.