October 2025

Anti-TL1A antibody, afimkibart, in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (TUSCANY-2): A multicentre, double-blind, treat-through, multi-dose, randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b trial

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025;10:882–95 Doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00129-3

Danese et al. report that in the TUSCANY-2 study, afimkibart showed a favourable
benefit–risk profile with clinically meaningful improvements and early onset of response during induction, sustained through maintenance, and an acceptable safety profile with no safety signals. Danese et al. describe results from the Phase 2b TUSCANY-2 trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of 50mg, 150mg, and 450mg doses of afimkibart in adults with moderately-to-severely active UC.

Keywords:

September 2024

Efficacy and safety of etrasimod in patients with moderately to severely active isolated proctitis: Results from the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC clinical programme

JJC 2024;18;391(3):2170 82. DOI 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae038

Peyrin-Biroulet et al. evaluated the efficacy and safety of etrasimod in patients with moderately to severely active isolated proctitis, demonstrating significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared to placebo. The study reported a favourable safety profile, making etrasimod a viable treatment option for this population.

Keywords:

May 2024

Etrasimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (ELEVATE): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies

Lancet 2023 Apr 8;401(10383):1159-1171 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00061-2

Etrasimod demonstrated significant efficacy in achieving clinical remission, and was well tolerated compared to placebo in an induction and maintenance therapy.

Keywords:

November 2023

生物学的製剤と低分子化合物で治療している免疫介在性炎症疾患患者の主要心血管イベントリスク: ネットワークメタ解析

CClin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;22:961-970.e12

The results of this study show that anti-IL-12/23, JAK inhibitors, and anti-TNF-α were associated with slightly higher risk of MACE compared with placebo. The risk was no different between biologic treatments, and the magnitude of risk did not differ between IMID type.

Keywords: