Publications

Post-Approval Comparative Safety Study of Tofacitinib and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 5-Year Results from a United States–Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021 Feb 11.

Kremer JM,

Bingham CO 3rd,

Cappelli LC,

Greenberg JD,

Madsen AM,

Geier J,

Rivas JL,

Onofrei AM,

Barr CJ,

Pappas DA,

Litman HJ,

Dandreo KJ,

Shapiro AB,

Connell CA,

Kavanaugh A

Analysis from the US Corrona RA registry has provided the longest-term real-world safety data for a JAK inhibitor to date. The analysis showed that the cohorts had similar adverse events, except for higher herpes zoster rates for tofacitinib initiators vs bDMARDs.Kremer JM, et al. analysed adult patients with RA newly initiating tofacitinib, or a bDMARD, to compare incidence rates of MACE, SIEs, HZ, malignancies and death. VTE data were also collected prospectively and assessed descriptively thr...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Tildrakizumab,
• Real-World

Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial

Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan 15:annrheumdis-2020-219213.

Westhovens R,

Rigby WF,

van der Heijde D,

Ching DW,

Stohl W,

Kay J,

Chopra A,

Bartok B,

Matzkies F,

Yin Z,

Guo Y,

Tasset C,

Sundy JS,

Jahreis A,

Mozaffarian N,

Messina OD,

Landewé R BM,

Atsumi T,

Burmester GR

Filgotinib doses in combination with MTX have shown improved signs, symptoms and physical function in patients with RA and limited or no prior MTX exposure. FIL 200mg monotherapy did not have a superior ACR20 response rate versus MTX. This 52-week, phase 3 study evaluated FIL in 1252 patients with RA. Patients were randomised to FIL 200mg + MTX or FIL 100mg + MTX, FIL 200 mg monotherapy, or MTX monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion patients achieving ACR20 at week 24. Safety was e...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Fenebrutinib,
• Phase 3

Upadacitinib Monotherapy Versus Methotrexate Monotherapy in Methotrexate-naïve Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Sub-analysis of The Phase 3 SELECT-EARLY study

Mod Rheumatol 2021;26:1–16.

Takeuchi T,

Rischmueller M,

Blanco R,

Xavier RM,

Ueki Y,

Atsumi T,

Chen S,

Friedman A,

Pangan AL,

Strand V,

van Vollenhoven RF

In this sub-analysis of the Phase 3 SELECT-EARLY study, UPA demonstrated clinical efficacy superior to placebo in the Japanese subpopulation. Along with a favourable efficacy observed with the Japan-specific 7.5 mg dose of UPA for all secondary endpoints. SELECT-EARLY was designed to study the safety and efficacy of UPA 15 and 30mg as monotherapy, but it also included a subset of 138 Japanese patients, 40% of whom were randomised to receive UPA 7.5mg. This was designed to meet the requirements o...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Updacitinib,
• Phase 3

Baricitinib Inhibits Structural Joint Damage Progression in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Comprehensive Review

Arthritis Res Ther 2021;23(1):3.

Emery P,

Durez P,

Hueber AJ,

Ide la Torre I,

Larsson E,

Holzkämper T,

Tanaka Y

MRI studies have shown that BARI reduces joint inflammation and damage in patients with moderate-to-severe active RA. This review summarises the effects of BARI on structural joint damage progression and the mechanisms underlying these effects, using MRI data from across the clinical trial program. Early preclinical animal models showed a significant reduction in joint inflammation, ankle width, and bone resorption. Efficacy and safety of BARI have been confirmed in an extensive programme, inclu...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Baricitinib,
• Radiographic,
• Review

Filgotinib Versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: A Phase III Randomised Clinical Trial

Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan 27:annrheumdis-2020-219214

Combe B,

Kivitz A,

Tanaka Y,

van der Heijde D,

Simon JA,

Baraf HSB,

Kumar U,

Matzkies F,

Bartok B,

Ye L,

Guo Y,

Tasset C,

Sundy JS,

Jahreis A,

Genovese MC,

Mozaffarian M,

Landewé RBM,

Bae S-C,

Keystone EC,

Nash P

Filgotinib improved RA signs and symptoms, physical function, and inhibited radiographic progression. FIL 200mg plus MTX, but not FIL 100mg plus MTX showed non-inferiority to ADA plus MTX, based on DAS28(CRP) low disease activity. FIL was also well tolerated in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX.This 52-week, phase 3 randomised clinical trial (FINCH 1) evaluated the efficacy and safety of FIL in patients with RA randomised to FIL 200 or 100mg, ADA 40mg, or placebo, all with background M...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Fenebrutinib,
• Phase 3

Upadacitinib for psoriatic arthritis refractory to biologics: SELECT-PsA 2

Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2021 Mar 1;80(3):312-20.

Mease PJ,

Lertratanakul A,

Anderson JK,

Papp K,

Van den Bosch F,

Tsuji S,

Dokoupilova E,

Keiserman M,

Wang X,

Zhong S,

McCaskill RM,

Zueger P,

Pangan AL,

Tillett W

In this trial of patients with active PsA who had inadequate response or intolerance to at least one biologic DMARD, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg was more effective than placebo over 24 weeks in improving signs and symptoms of PsA. Despite the availability of bDMARDs in PsA, only a small proportion of patients achieve the recommended target of minimal disease activity; as such, additional treatment options are needed. Upadacitinib is under evaluation for PsA. This paper reports the 24-week data ...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Updacitinib,
• Phase 3

Highlights of 2020

Please click the links below to go to the CSF review of each paper

McInnes. I

2020 unfolded apace, dominated by COVID-19 - we have all had to adapt in our practice and in our knowledge base. Amid this there have continued to be a constant flow of publications and science in cytokine signaling, and as in previous years as we come the end of 2020, I will highlight some of the notable papers of the year. You can find the most notable papers, as selected by CSF Steering Committee Chair Professor Iain McInnes, with links to their respective detailed summaries below:

Keywords:

• Review

Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic literature research

RMD Open 2020;6:e001374 doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001374

Kerschbaumer A,

Smolen JS,

Nash P,

Doerner T,

Dougados M,

Fleischmann R,

Geissler K,

McInnes IM,

Takeuchi T,

Trauner M,

Winthrop K,

de Wit M,

Boehncke W-H,

Falzon L,

van der Heijde D

Trials of JAKi have been conducted in many therapy areas, including rheumatology, dermatology and gastroenterology. In 2019, a task force was set up to create a consensus to guide clinicians on how to use JAKi in clinical practice. This systematic literature review conducted in 2019 support this consensusIn line with EULAR’s standardised operating procedures for recommendations, a literature search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library databases. To evaluate the efficacy of t...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Review

Switching between Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib and adalimumab following insufficient response: efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Ann Rheum Dis 2020; doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-21841220

Fleischmann RM,

Blanco R,

Hall S,

Thomson GTD,

Van den Bosch FE,

Zerbini C,

Bessette L,

Enejosa J,

Li Y,

Song Y,

DeMasi R,

Song I-H

Both ACR and EULAR recommend adding a biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD in patients who do not achieve treatment goals at follow-up. Findings indicated that an immediate switch in mechanism of action (from JAKi to TNFi and vice versa) following treat-to-target principles is feasible with minimal risk of flare regardless of whether patients are switched due to non-response or incomplete-response.SELECT-COMPARE followed treat-to-target principles to examine the efficacy of switching in two pati...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• TNF,
• Updacitinib,
• Adherence,
• Switching

Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Integrated Analysis from the SELECT Phase III Clinical Programme

Ann Rheum Dis 2020 DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218510

Cohen SB,

van Vollenhoven RF,

Winthrop KL,

Zerbini CAF,

Tanaka Y,

Bessette L,

Zhang Y,

Khan N,

Hendrickson B,

Enejosa JV,

Burmester GR.

This integrated Phase III safety analysis of UPA showed that UPA had a similar profile to ADA and MTX for serious infections, malignancies, and thromboembolic events. Patients receiving UPA had increased risk of HZ and creatine phosphokinase elevation versus ADA.This integrated Phase III safety analysis of UPA examined >3500 RA patients and 4000 patient-years of exposure. Data were pooled from 3834 patients in SELECT-NEXT, SELECT-BEYOND, SELECT-MONOTHERAPY, SELECT-COMPARE and SELECT-EARLY studie...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Updacitinib,
• Safety,
• Phase 3