November 2025

A retrospective observational study of effectiveness of sequential biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in psoriatic arthritis in the UK

Rheumatology 2025 Doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf570 Epub ahead of print

Gollins et al. reported that within this cohort, the Psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC) response to 4th+ lines of b/tsDMARD was not significantly reduced compared with 2nd/3rd line in participants who had failed at least 3 b/tsDMARDs. Authors evaluated the primary clinical response to sequential lines of b/tsDMARD therapy in PsA, focusing on the effectiveness of later line treatments.

Keywords:

March 2025

Achievement of endoscopic remission after induction reduces hospitalization burden in Crohn’s Disease: findings from a pooled post hoc analysis of risankizumab and upadacitinib Phase III trials

J Crohns Colitis. 2025 Feb 4;19(2):jjae128. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae128.

Panaccione et al. investigated the association between achievement of endoscopic remission following induction therapy and hospitalisation outcomes in Crohn’s disease. Patients achieving endoscopic remission at Week 12 experienced a 55% reduction in Crohn’s disease-related hospitalisation rates over the 52-week maintenance period. The results support endoscopic remission as an early therapeutic target.

Keywords:

November 2024

Intensified versus standard dose infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (PREDICT-UC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Lancet. 2024;9:981–96 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00200-0

Choy et al. investigated the efficacy and safety of intensified versus standard infliximab dosing for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). The study found that a first dose of 10mg/kg infliximab was not superior to the standard 5mg/kg dose in achieving clinical response by Day 7. Earlier responses were noted with dose intensification, but no significant differences were observed in remission, colectomy rates, or safety profiles by Month 3.

Keywords:

Bimekizumab Treatment in Patients With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis: 52-week Efficacy and Safety from the Randomised Parallel Phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2 Studies

Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;83(2):199–213 doi 10.1136/ard-2023-224803

Baraliakos, et al. present data from two Phase 3 studies, BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2, that investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axSpA patients. They found that bimekizumab had sustained and consistent efficacy in patients with nr-axSpA and r-axSpA.

Keywords:

October 2023

Anti-gm-csf Otilimab versus Sarilumab or Placebo in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Targeted Therapies: A Phase III Randomised Trial (contRAst 3)

Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(12):1527–1537 doi 10.1136/ard-2023-224449

The ContRAst 3 study investigated otilimab, in RA patients with inadequate responses to multiple treatments. Otilimab did not significantly improve ACR20 versus placebo at Weeks 12 or 24. In addition, there we no significant improvements in secondary endpoints, including disease activity, disability, and pain.

Keywords:

Anti-GM-CSF Otilimab Versus Tofacitinib or Placebo in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional or Biologic DMARDs: Two Phase 3 Randomised Trials (contRAst 1 and contRAst 2)

Ann Rheum Dis 2023;0:1–11 doi 10.1136/ard-2023-224482

Fleischmann, et al investigated the safety and efficacy of otilimab versus tofacitinib and placebo in RA patients treated with MTX (contRAst 1) or csDMARDs (contRAst 2). They found that while otilimab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 versus placebo in Week 12, it did not demonstrate non-inferiority to tofacitinib.

Keywords:

July 2023

Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Baricitinib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Australian OPAL Data Set

ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023;5(7):345-353 doi 10.1002/acr2.11577

Cicirello, et al. present results showing that baricitinib is comparable in treatment persistence with TNF inhibitors. However, treatment persistence up to 24 months was significantly longer for baricitinib, but the effect size of one month is not clinically meaningful.

Keywords:

February 2023

Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results of Two Parallel Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Trials

Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan 17 doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223595

Bimekizumab may therefore offer patients with axSpA an effective treatment option with a novel mode of action.

Keywords:

January 2023

Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Three-Year Results From a Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial and Its Open-Label Extension Study

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:1943–58

In this open-label extension study of BE AGILE, the safety profile of bimekizumab was found to be consistent with previously demonstrated findings, and no new safety signals were identified. The objective was to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with active AS.

Keywords:

October 2022

Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results from the Randomized SPIRIT-H2H Trial

Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022 doi: 10.5826/dpc.1202a104

Ixekizumab (IXE)-treated patients achieved significantly greater simultaneous PASI100 and ACR50 responses through W52 versus adalimumab (ADA)-treated, confirming IXE as an efficacious and safe treatment. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of IXE and ADA in the subgroup of patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO through W52.

Keywords: