Publications

Risk of herpes zoster (shingles) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic, targeted synthetic and conventional synthetic DMARD treatment: data from the German RABBIT register

Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul 28:annrheumdis-2021-220651

Redeker I,

Albrecht K,

Kekow J,

Burmester GR,

Braun J,

Schäfer M,

Zink A,

Strangfeld A

A 3.6-fold increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ) is associated with tsDMARDs, and an increased risk is associated with bDMARDs, compared with csDMARDs. It is now well known that patients with RA have an increased risk of developing herpes zoster (HZ), and that incidence rates appear to be increased with TNF and JAK inhibitors. To this end, Redeker, et al. used data from the German RABBIT Registry to compare event and incidence rates of HZ in patients with RA treated with the three different DMAR...

Keywords:

• Safety,
• Infections,
• Review

Real‑world evaluation of effectiveness, persistence, and usage patterns of monotherapy and combination therapy tofacitinib in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Australia

Clin Rheumatol. 2021. Epub ahead of print doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05853-x

Bird P,

Littlejohn G,

Butcher B,

Smith T,

O'Sullivan C,

Witcombe D,

Griffiths H.

Real-world evidence suggests that monotherapy and combination therapy tofacitinib is an effective intervention in RA with persistence and effectiveness comparable to bDMARDs. Despite recommendations from EULAR that bDMARDs and tsDMARDs be used in combination with csDMARDs for the treatment of RA, it is estimated that up to a third of patients take their medication as monotherapy.This post hoc analysis of data from the Australian OPAL study by Bird, et al. aimed to describe the real-world effecti...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Tofacitinib,
• Efficacy,
• Real-World

Associations of baseline use of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs with COVID-19 severity in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry

Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 May 28. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220418

Sparks JA,

Wallace ZS,

Seet AM,

Gianfrancesco MA,

Izadi Z,

Hyrich KL,

et al.

Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry show that people with RA using rituximab or JAKi, at COVID-19 onset, are more likely to experience poor COVID-19 outcomes, ranging from hospitalisation to death, compared with use of TNFi.The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on people with RA, many of whom are treated with b/tsDMARDs. To help address some of the knowledge gaps around the influence of b/tsDMARDs on COVID-19 outcomes, Sparks, et al. ana...

Comparative efficacy and safety of secukinumab, ixekizumab, and tofacitinib in patients with active psoriatic arthritis showing insufficient response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021. Epub ahead of print.

Song GG,

Lee YH.

Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) highlights the effectiveness of secukinumab, ixekizumab, and tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).There is a current need for therapies with alternative mechanisms of actions to DMARDs and TNFi, for the significant proportion of patients with PsA who insufficiently respond to these therapies. While RCTs for therapies such as secukinumab a...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• IL-17,
• Secukinumab,
• Tofacitinib,
• Efficacy,
• Safety

Assessment of radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib in long-term studies

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(4):1708-1716.

van der Heijde D,

Landewé RBM,

Wollenhaupt J,

Strengholt S,

Terry K,

Kwok K,

Wang L,

Cohen S.

Long-term evaluation of tofacitinib has found limited progression of structural damage in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib for up to 5 years. Similar results were also observed for patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy or combination therapy for up to 3 years.It is well known that inflammation in RA leads to structural damage over time, and therapies such as DMARDS have the ability to reduce inflammation whilst inhibiting the progression of structural damage. In this study, van der...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Tofacitinib,
• LTE,
• Radiographic

Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Benefit–Risk Assessment Across a Phase III Program

Drug Saf. 2021 Feb 2. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-01036-w

Conaghan PG,

Mysler E,

Tanaka Y,

Da Silva-Tillmann B,

Shaw T,

Liu J,

Ferguson R,

Enejosa JV,

Cohen S,

Nash P,

Rigby W,

Burmester G

Upadacitinib 15 mg has a favourable benefit–risk profile according to an assessment of data from the phase III SELECT clinical trial programme.In this review of data for the once-daily, oral JAK inhibitor, Conaghan PG, et al. provided insights into the benefit–risk profile of upadacitinib in approximately 4400 patients with RA. Based on pooled data from five pivotal studies, benefits and risks were assessed up to the time of regulatory submission, and additional long-term integrated safety revie...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Upadacitinib,
• Phase 3,
• Review

Post-Approval Comparative Safety Study of Tofacitinib and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 5-Year Results from a United States–Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021 Feb 11.

Kremer JM,

Bingham CO 3rd,

Cappelli LC,

Greenberg JD,

Madsen AM,

Geier J,

Rivas JL,

Onofrei AM,

Barr CJ,

Pappas DA,

Litman HJ,

Dandreo KJ,

Shapiro AB,

Connell CA,

Kavanaugh A

Analysis from the US Corrona RA registry has provided the longest-term real-world safety data for a JAK inhibitor to date. The analysis showed that the cohorts had similar adverse events, except for higher herpes zoster rates for tofacitinib initiators vs bDMARDs.Kremer JM, et al. analysed adult patients with RA newly initiating tofacitinib, or a bDMARD, to compare incidence rates of MACE, SIEs, HZ, malignancies and death. VTE data were also collected prospectively and assessed descriptively thr...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Tildrakizumab,
• Real-World

Upadacitinib for psoriatic arthritis refractory to biologics: SELECT-PsA 2

Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2021 Mar 1;80(3):312-20.

Mease PJ,

Lertratanakul A,

Anderson JK,

Papp K,

Van den Bosch F,

Tsuji S,

Dokoupilova E,

Keiserman M,

Wang X,

Zhong S,

McCaskill RM,

Zueger P,

Pangan AL,

Tillett W

In this trial of patients with active PsA who had inadequate response or intolerance to at least one biologic DMARD, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg was more effective than placebo over 24 weeks in improving signs and symptoms of PsA. Despite the availability of bDMARDs in PsA, only a small proportion of patients achieve the recommended target of minimal disease activity; as such, additional treatment options are needed. Upadacitinib is under evaluation for PsA. This paper reports the 24-week data ...

Keywords:

• JAK,
• Upadacitinib,
• Phase 3

Comparative effectiveness of first-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitor versus non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologics and targeted synthetic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large US registry study

Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:96–102.

Pappas DA,

St John G,

Etzel CJ,

Fiore S,

Blachley T,

Kimura T,

Punekar R,

Emeanuru K,

Choi J,

Boklage S,

Kremer JM

RA treatment guidelines recommend a treat-to-target approach guided by disease stage and treatment history, yet the optimal sequence of different treatment modalities has not been established. Data from Corrona – were used to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TNFi versus non-TNFi bDMARDs and tsDMARDs as first-line treatment following csDMARD failure. Results support RA guidelines recommending individualised care based on clinical judgement and consideration of patient preference.The stud...

Keywords:

• Real-World

Highlights of 2020

Please click the links below to go to the CSF review of each paper

McInnes. I

2020 unfolded apace, dominated by COVID-19 - we have all had to adapt in our practice and in our knowledge base. Amid this there have continued to be a constant flow of publications and science in cytokine signaling, and as in previous years as we come the end of 2020, I will highlight some of the notable papers of the year. You can find the most notable papers, as selected by CSF Steering Committee Chair Professor Iain McInnes, with links to their respective detailed summaries below:

Keywords:

• Review